HAS THE BYPASS TRUST GONE THE WAY OF THE DINOSAUR?
Gillian M. Stein
February 17, 2013 “Lawyer for Seniors”
Q. My wife and I had our Living Trust prepared about 8 years ago. I hear there is a new tax law which just went into effect. Is it time to have our trust reviewed?
A. You refer to the recently enacted “American Taxpayer Relief Act” which has permanently enlarged the estate tax exemption to $5,250,000 per person (2013). It also permits a married couple to effectively double their exemption even without special estate tax planning.
By comparison, when you created your trust the estate tax exemption was much smaller, and special tax planning was required to minimize estate taxes. At the time, your attorney probably recommended a form of trust which was tailored to the lower estate tax exemption, namely a Living Trust with a Bypass Sub-Trust built into it. This Bypass Sub-Trust is also known as a “B Trust” and Exemption Trust, a Family Trust, and a Credit Shelter Trust.
Bypass trusts typically require that, on the death of the first spouse, a share of the couple’s assets be transferred into an irrevocable sub-trust called the “Bypass Trust”, rather than to the survivor directly. This is to preserve the first spouse’s estate tax exemption for later use at the survivor’s death. Without the Bypass, the first spouse’s estate tax exemption would be lost and all trust assets at the survivor’s death would be sheltered by only the survivor’s one exemption and the excess (if any) was exposed to an estate tax at a rate as high as 55%. Understandably, couples went to great lengths to avoid that tax.
The typical Bypass Trust was not, however, without problems:
1. the survivor typically lost the right to make any changes in the Bypass portion even if the family circumstances changes.
2. the survivor’s access to the Bypass assets was usually restricted
3. it interfered with applying for a Medi-Cal long term care subsidy, and
4. it usually required the preparation of separate accounting and income tax returns during the life time of the survivor.
5. Surviving spouses usually found the restrictions burdensome.
Two important new developments arrived with the new law:
1. as of 2013, the amount of the estate tax exemption has now permanently increased to $5,250,000 per person, to be annually adjusted for inflation, and
2. the unused portion of the first spouse’s full exemption is now preserved for use by the second spouse even without the use of the restrictive Bypass Trust, effectively doubling the exemption for most couples.(This is also known as portability).
In view of these new developments, couples with Bypass Trusts created for estate tax purposes under the old law should have their trusts reviewed and, where appropriate, consider eliminating the mandatory funding feature at the first spouse’s death. Instead, they might now consider plans which give the survivor the option of doing postmortem planning after the first death, e.g. by funding a portion of trust assets into an optional Disclaimer Trust. The Disclaimer Trust would then operate as a tax-saving Bypass Trust if that later appeared necessary due to the increase in value of the couple’s estate. (The option of a Disclaimer Trust must be exercised within 9 months of the first to die).
In that sense, I suppose you could say that the Bypass Trust has gone the way of the Dinosaur for most middle income estate plans, where it is unlikely that the couple’s estate would ever exceed two exemptions, i.e. $10,500,000 (for persons dying in 2013), and inflation indexed thereafter.
An Exception to the above recommendation: The use of the mandatory Bypass Trust is still useful for non-tax purposes e.g. situations involving second marriages. Here, each spouse usually wishes to provide financial security for the survivor, but also wishes to preserve a portion of assets for his/her own children. Under these circumstances, a Bypass Trust can still help these couples achieve their estate planning goals.